Home Free Library Store
Free Catalog



Save with a Two Year Membership

To post in the forums see the Forum Guidelines.
Join or Renew Today.
New Benefits for all VU Members
Forum Guidelines and FAQ
Main Index Search Posts
Who's Online Log In



Home: Inactive Forums: Casablanca Users:
using same software on 2 of my krons

 
 


X-derek_woodland_bristol_england
Imported Account

Oct 22, 2003, 5:00 PM

Post #1 of 12 (2597 views)
Shortcut
using same software on 2 of my krons Can't Post
Does anyone know how to put the same software on both of my two krons. i have tried removing and fixing the hard drive from one
and installing all software on using the second kron fine. But upon fixing it back in
the 2nd kron it seems to recognise a different serial no and
wont work. i dont really want to purchase another very expensive
load of software when the two krons sit side by side.


X-Arny
Imported Account

Oct 22, 2003, 11:10 PM

Post #2 of 12 (2594 views)
Shortcut
Re: using same software on 2 of my krons Can't Post
Derek,
I understand not wanting to purchase a second lot of software but unfortunately what you are trying to do would be illegal.
There is good news though, it would seem that DJROCK and his friend Pat may specialise in this sort of thing so my recommendation is, check out their web site (which goes around in circles) and if you are game send your hard earned cash to them and let us all know if you actually receive anything worthwhile for your trouble.
Regards,
Arny
: Does anyone know how to put the same software on both of my two krons. i have tried removing and fixing the hard drive from one
: and installing all software on using the second kron fine. But upon fixing it back in
: the 2nd kron it seems to recognise a different serial no and
: wont work. i dont really want to purchase another very expensive
: load of software when the two krons sit side by side.


X-Steve
Imported Account

Oct 23, 2003, 2:12 PM

Post #3 of 12 (2591 views)
Shortcut
Re: using same software on 2 of my krons [In reply to] Can't Post
: Derek,
: I understand not wanting to purchase a second lot of software but unfortunately what you are trying to do would be illegal.
: There is good news though, it would seem that DJROCK and his friend Pat may specialise in this sort of thing so my recommendation is, check out their web site
don't forget that this whole DJROCK thing is illegal, too !!!


X-Pat
Imported Account

Oct 23, 2003, 6:20 PM

Post #4 of 12 (2591 views)
Shortcut
Nothing illegal about DJROCK upgrades [In reply to] Can't Post
There is nothing illegal, unethical or even immoral about any of the modifications or upgrades performed by DJROCK.
Instead of posting a valid rebuttal you (BOB) have made a libelous statement then censored DJROCK so he is not able to reply to your condemnations.

This statement you made is an act of libel:

"don't forget that this whole DJROCK thing is illegal, too !!!"

To add to this insult it appears 'Banned Bob' has posted the above libelous comment under someone else's identity. The email Steve@Steve.com belongs to a Steve Perillo of New Jersey.

------Definition of Libel-------

LIBEL - Published material meeting three conditions: The material is defamatory either on its face or indirectly; The defamatory statement is about someone who is identifiable to one or more persons; and, The material must be distributed to someone other than the offended party; i.e. published; distinguished from slander.

Criminal Law. A malicious defamation expressed either in printing or writing or by signs or pictures, tending to blacken the memory of one who is dead, with intent to provoke the living; or the reputation of one who is alive and to expose him to public hatred, contempt or ridicule. It has been defined perhaps with more precision to be a censorious or ridiculous writing, picture or sign, made with a malicious or mischievous intent.



X-derek_woodland_bristol_england
Imported Account

Oct 24, 2003, 5:21 AM

Post #5 of 12 (2590 views)
Shortcut
Re: using same software on 2 of my krons [In reply to] Can't Post
even though i agree with all of you ,i have legally purchased two
krons and legally paid for software, why cant i do i as want with
it? i have now given up in finding an answer and have just given
£700 to my cassie supplier for somehing i already have!
namely smart edit v3 and arabesk dvd ,spicerack, what a con?
i am sure all this cash is being used by the suppliers to invest into furthering the good of the cassablanca given over by us guinee pigs. do those who edit on computers get the same problem. i mean ! whose ever heard of having to hand over £70 just install a few fonts, are they not supplied with computers?
thoroughly cheesed off! derek


X-ChetD
Imported Account

Oct 24, 2003, 10:13 AM

Post #6 of 12 (2590 views)
Shortcut
Re: using same software on 2 of my krons [In reply to] Can't Post
Hello Derek,
I do not know if there is such an offer from other distributors - but in North America, MacroSystem US offers a multiple software discount, 40% off your 2nd and successive software title for additional editors.

Although a good number of folks get around it, yes - there is copyright law that indicates you purchase computer software for a specific machine and should (legally) only use that software on one unit. You are authorized to make a back-up copy but should purcase a 2nd copy or in the case of institutions, a site license or lab pack for multiple installations of the same software title.
Regards,
Chet


X-Steve
Imported Account

Oct 24, 2003, 3:16 PM

Post #7 of 12 (2590 views)
Shortcut
Re: using same software on 2 of my krons [In reply to] Can't Post
if you buy two windows PCs, you have to buy the software for both systems or you have to buy a multiple license software
if you buy two cars, you have to buy the extras for both cars
sorry, but that's it, I guess
Steve


X-Banned_Bob_
Imported Account

Oct 27, 2003, 10:28 AM

Post #8 of 12 (2591 views)
Shortcut
Re: Nothing smart about DJROCK [In reply to] Can't Post
Some person or persons at 209.161.242.113 [DNS query for 209.161.242.113 failed: Queried domain does not exist] posing as Pat and using an email address of pscialdone211@rogers.com [an invalid recipient according to fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com] posted the following:
> Instead of posting a valid rebuttal you (BOB) have made a libelous statement then censored DJROCK so he is not able to reply to your condemnations.
> To add to this insult it appears 'Banned Bob' has posted the above libelous comment under someone else's identity. The email Steve@Steve.com belongs to a Steve Perillo of New Jersey.
Whoever posted this calling yourself Pat, I hope you don't get offended, but your ignorance (look it up if you don't know what it means) of the internet and this century's technology is showing again -- not to mention your ability to read. The message you're referring to is signed by "Steve", not by me. I have no idea who is signing Steve's name and address, but might it be Steve? I don't know. Obviously you haven't considered that at all. The IP address it was posted from is registered in Germany. Just do a simple lookup ... even YOU can find that out -- that's how we know that YOU are posting under several different names.
You can't hide your IP address. The Earthlink servers I'm on onto typically assign me one of the addresses of 24.225.50.246 or 24.136.173.4 -- always starting with 24 (I think it's a Mindspring trunk that RoadRunner, Earthlink, and AOL all rent from Time Warner Cable).
This is all very obvious and very verifiable.
However for the rest of you ... this brings us to the point that "Pat" is making --
Has HE committed this offense???
According to his post LIBEL:
"is defamatory either on its face or indirectly"
"Pat" wrote: "you (BOB) have made a libelous statement then censored DJROCK" and "'Banned Bob' has posted the above libelous comment under someone else's identity" -- none of which is true and it's provable -- that's defamatory!.
"is about someone who is identifiable to one or more persons"
"Pat" first writes "you (BOB)" which could have directed at any of the millions ... but then he writes, "'Banned Bob'" -- which is obviously a very exclusive term that applies to ME!
"must be distributed to someone other than the offended party"
"Pat" publicly posted this on the internet where he knows that ANYONE can read it.
Three strikes, Pat!
Now all we have to do is find out the true identity of "Pat" and he's OUT!
Please stick to the topics, guys!


X-Steve
Imported Account

Oct 28, 2003, 2:29 PM

Post #9 of 12 (2591 views)
Shortcut
Re: Nothing smart about DJROCK [In reply to] Can't Post
"The message you're referring to is signed by "Steve", not by me. I have no idea who is signing Steve's name and address, but might it be Steve? I don't know. Obviously you haven't considered that at all. The IP address it was posted from is registered in Germany. "
As far as I know, all messages posted by Steve have been posted by me, Steve. Yes I am from Germany. So what?
I am not Bob and I am not Pat. :-)
I am just a Casablanca user who is happy with his equipment.
And yes, I don't believe in 16 digit miracle codes and I do not believe in a tutorial mode... ;-)
Steve



X-Banned_Bob
Imported Account

Oct 28, 2003, 7:53 PM

Post #10 of 12 (2591 views)
Shortcut
Re: Nothing smart about DJROCK [In reply to] Can't Post
: As far as I know, all messages posted by Steve have been posted by me, Steve. Yes I am from Germany. So what?
: And yes, I don't believe in 16 digit miracle codes and I do not believe in a tutorial mode... ;-)
: Steve
So now we've firmly established who we are, Steve. Does anyone know who this libelous "Pat" person is? The only thing we know for sure is that he works for DJROCK and is one brick short of a load ... once posting as pscialdone211@rogers.com under the name "Patrick" and inquring about his own products, then later posting a defense of his company under the name "Pat" at the same email address.
I don't know, Steve, but maybe he committed libel against YOU, too, by calling you "BOB" ;-)
Maybe he'll just disappear -- if we're lucky!


X-LAB
Imported Account

Nov 28, 2003, 5:55 AM

Post #11 of 12 (2590 views)
Shortcut
AVIO upgrades and custom modifications [In reply to] Can't Post
Are you referring to this:
http://alphazee.webstrikesolutions.com/avio0603/Promotions/Casablanca%20AVIO%20Promotions.htm?subject=Avio%20Power%20Sale


X-llord_steve_nelson
Imported Account

Mar 16, 2004, 7:25 AM

Post #12 of 12 (2591 views)
Shortcut
Re: needs a wedsite with the name [In reply to] Can't Post
: Some person or persons at 209.161.242.113 [DNS query for 209.161.242.113 failed: Queried domain does notng as Pat and using an email address of pscialdone211@rogers.com [an invalid recipient according to fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com] posted the following:
: > Instead of posting a valid rebuttal you (BOB) have made a libelous statement then censored DJROCK so he is not able to reply to your condemnations.
: > To add to this insult it appears 'Banned Bob' has posted the above libelous comment under someone else's identity. The email Steve@Steve.com belongs to a Steve Perillo of New Jersey.
: Whoever posted this calling yourself Pat, I hope you don't get offended, but your ignorance (look it up if you don't know what it means) of the internet and this century's technology is showing again -- not to mention your ability to read. The message you're referring to is signed by "Steve", not by me. I have no idea who is signing Steve's name and address, but might it be Steve? I don't know. Obviously you haven't considered that at all. The IP address it was posted from is registered in Germany. Just do a simple lookup ... even YOU can find that out -- that's how we know that YOU are posting under several different names.
: You can't hide your IP address. The Earthlink servers I'm on onto typically assign me one of the addresses of 24.225.50.246 or 24.136.173.4 -- always starting with 24 (I think it's a Mindspring trunk that RoadRunner, Earthlink, and AOL all rent from Time Warner Cable).
: This is all very obvious and very verifiable.
: However for the rest of you ... this brings us to the point that "Pat" is making --
: Has HE committed this offense???
: According to his post LIBEL:
: "is defamatory either on its face or indirectly"
: "Pat" wrote: "you (BOB) have made a libelous statement then censored DJROCK" and "'Banned Bob' has posted the above libelous comment under someone else's identity" -- none of which is true and it's provable -- that's defamatory!.
: "is about someone who is identifiable to one or more persons"
: "Pat" first writes "you (BOB)" which could have directed at any of the millions ... but then he writes, "'Banned Bob'" -- which is obviously a very exclusive term that applies to ME!
: "must be distributed to someone other than the offended party"
: "Pat" publicly posted this on the internet where he knows that ANYONE can read it.
: Three strikes, Pat!
: Now all we have to do is find out the true identity of "Pat" and he's OUT!
: Please stick to the topics, guys!