Home Free Library Store
Free Catalog



Save with a Two Year Membership

To post in the forums see the Forum Guidelines.
Join or Renew Today.
New Benefits for all VU Members
Forum Guidelines and FAQ
Main Index Search Posts
Who's Online Log In



Home: Video University Forums: Audio For Video:
Mic to complement h4n

 

First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All


Chris Nick
User


Jun 12, 2009, 9:29 PM

Post #1 of 59 (2558 views)
Shortcut
Mic to complement h4n Can't Post

I just bought a zoom h4n. Its first use will be a musical performance of a solo guitar player in a coffee house type setting. I know this is a solid recorder but not high end. If I were to decide to get a couple of mics to do 4 channel recording with the h4n, what would be the best alternative which wouldn't be overkill as compared to the onboard mics?

For next week, I'll probably put a Senn G2 on his lapel and the h4n on a mic stand. Has anyone used the sennheiser e835? Is this pretty good for an inexpensive mic, and how would the sound compare with the H4n onboard mics?


Brackish
Veteran


Jun 12, 2009, 9:48 PM

Post #2 of 59 (2552 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Chris Nick] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
Its first use will be a musical performance of a solo guitar player in a coffee house type setting. I know this is a solid recorder but not high end. If I were to decide to get a couple of mics to do 4 channel recording with the h4n, what would be the best alternative which wouldn't be overkill as compared to the onboard mics?


So you're looking for a couple mic's. For what purpose? In what price
range? It's hard to give decent recommendations without knowing
some more info.



------------------------------------------------------------
"still motion is who everyone else is trying to be like"


Chris Nick
User


Jun 12, 2009, 11:01 PM

Post #3 of 59 (2548 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Brackish] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post

So, my thought is that the onboard mics for the h4n, can't be of amazing quality or it wouldn't cost $350. I guess even with a sound recorder which is good bang for the buck but not in the quality range of the edirol r44, I'm wondering how much I should think about spending for mics to plug into the h4n xlr inputs and record in 4 channels. Is there something in the $100 range that would produce as good sound quality as the unit can record? Or should I just ignore the xlrs and wait until I can afford to buy a couple of really good mics (for my budget that's anything much more than $250) If I could afford multiple mics such as rode ntg3s, then maybe I wouldn't have a question.

Currently my sound equipment consists of 2 senn g2 systems (I also have the board feed add-on), the h4n, an iriver, and a short shotgun (Panny AGMC100) that I use on camera. I feel like that's a pretty decent start at least for doing weddings, but obviously if I'm in a situation with multiple musicians playing in a recital, or performance setting, I'd probably want to put another 2 mics on stands to pick up either secondary instruments or possibly audience. I realize that the panasonic shotgun mic would be better used either on a boom or a mic stand perhaps fed into the h4n, rather than its current use as an on-camera mic, so maybe I only need to buy one other mic to go with the h4n.

I'm still very much a beginner so I have a limited budget. However, I do have a friend who is an agent for a number of classical musicians, and I have talked to her about taping/ recording their work for promotional purposes. So I want to be able to have good enough equipment to do this, without the expectation that I'm trying to compete with a recording studio (or perhaps some of the excellent sound guys around here).

Thanks for your help Brackish


MLiebergot
Veteran


Jun 13, 2009, 6:06 AM

Post #4 of 59 (2538 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Chris Nick] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post

First off the oboard mics n the H4n are surprisingly good. Not great but they are of good quality.

It also helps that you can rotate the mics for either 90 or 12 degrees of usage. So for recording musical instruments it should perform better than you expect, for video usage.

Now for even better recording of musicians, using 4 channels, onboard mics + pair of XLR based mics would perform even better giving you a fuller sound.

I am a fan of the Rode mics, but not the shotgun mics you mentioned, but rather the Rode M3 (condenser mic with built in 0/-10/-20 db pad)
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/...dioid_Condenser.html it is a rather large mic, but performs great in just about any circumstance I have used them in (I have 2 of these).

The Studio Projects C4 is also a good choice for an affordable condenser mic. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/...hragm_Condenser.html

The Rode NT5's are also a good choice. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/...NT5_Matched_Pair.htm

Now I could recommend a lot of other mics, but these are a good standard start. I will say that love my M3's.
For general usage, stay away from using shotgun mics. As they work great outdoors but perform very poorly indoors, because there is too much reflection from the walls, that bleed into the side of the mics. If I was to recommend a shotgun mic, for overall use, I would say the NTG2 is great, or AT45. Stay away from the Sennhesier ME66, as it's great for outdoor use, but way too sensitive or indoor.

Feel free to PM me with any questions as, even though I am a vidoegrapher, my background is in sound production (15 years).

My current audio setup is:
Marantz PMD620, Zoom H2, Zoom H4n, Edirol R44 (just sold Edirol R09, and use to own M-Audio Microtrack, Zoom H4).

For mics, I have matched pair of Rode NT5's, pair of Rode M3s, Rode NT3, Rode NTG2, Studio Projects LSD2, and more.

I would love to own Neuman or Scoeps mics, but they are too far out of my price range. So I try to find the best affordable audio gear I can. And by affordable, I mean good performing, reliable affordable gear, and not overly expensive. More middle of the road solid performing.

Michael

Cameras: (3) Sony FX1, Canon HV20
Audio: Marantz PMD620, Edirol R44, ZoomH4N, ZoomH2, Sennhesier G2
Mics: Rode NT5, Rode NT3, Rode M3, Rode NTG2, Shure SM57, AT822
Software: Sony Vegas, Final Cut Studio
Computer: MAC BABY! MacPro, MacBook Pro

(This post was edited by MLiebergot on Jun 13, 2009, 6:14 AM)


Mark Foley
Veteran


Jun 13, 2009, 6:47 AM

Post #5 of 59 (2535 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Chris Nick] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post

As Michael has stated, the Zoom, although built in China Pirate, does have some good onboard mics...surprisingly good.

If I was going to recommend a mic, I ALWAYS suggest starting with Shure SM57s...the industry standard for many years and probably many years to follow. You can drive a garbage truck over them and they will still work. Although there are much better mics (at a significantly higher cost), you have to place those high dollar mics correctly or you will be disappointed in how much money you blew on the purchase... You just can't beat a solid dynamic mic like the SM57...as long as the signal is not overloading into the recorder, you'll get a rock solid capture.


edit...as my son just reminded me, you go into just about any good recording studio and I will bet you will find SM57s in use somewhere. Sure, there will find all the high dollar stuff that is way out of our price range...but I will almost guarantee there will be a 57 capturing an instrument somewhere.
_________________________
Mark






(This post was edited by Mark Foley on Jun 13, 2009, 6:51 AM)


Chris Nick
User


Jun 13, 2009, 9:19 AM

Post #6 of 59 (2517 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Mark Foley] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post

Mark and Michael,

Thanks for your awesome suggestions. It sounds to me that as I get farther into this, you can never have enough mics. So I'm thinking I'll get a couple of SM57 now and then see how many musical gigs I get before spending too much money. I think the M3s may be my second pair of mics once I know more of what I'm doing. The guitar center a couple of miles away actually has them for the same price as B&H.

So Mark, which would you use for vocals, a Senn G2 lav plugged into the H4N, or a ShureSM57?

Or should I just place the H4n up close to capture both the instrument and vocals and have the Shures placed back and to the side? On the amp?

I can use the second Senn G2 to sync from the H4N into the camera.

Thanks --Chris


fr0gm@n
Veteran


Jun 13, 2009, 6:48 PM

Post #7 of 59 (2504 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Mark Foley] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


Quote
You can drive a garbage truck over them and they will still work.



If you drive a garbage truck over it then won't the audio you capture sound like .... well....garbage TongueWinkSly Assuming you were recording while driving over it. SlySlySlySlySly


Shouldn't TV's Discovery Channel be on a different station every day?


frog blog


Brackish
Veteran


Jun 13, 2009, 9:34 PM

Post #8 of 59 (2493 views)
Shortcut
Re: [MLiebergot] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
For mics, I have matched pair of Rode NT5's, pair of Rode M3s, Rode NT3, Rode NTG2, Studio Projects LSD2

What do you think of that LSD2, Michael. I was looking at that one a while back.



------------------------------------------------------------
"still motion is who everyone else is trying to be like"


Mark Foley
Veteran


Jun 14, 2009, 6:33 AM

Post #9 of 59 (2480 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Chris Nick] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


Quote
So Mark, which would you use for vocals, a Senn G2 lav plugged into the H4N, or a ShureSM57?

Since I have only the H2 and not the new/redesigned H4n, Michael would be in the best position to answer this as he has first hand experience with the pre-amps of the H4n and the unit itself. The H4n with its internal mics and placed in close proximity would probably work good...once again I'm not sure if you can capture bot from an external source and internal at the same time. I still stand by my recommendation of a SM57 for the amp.

FWIW...I had another super recording experience last night with a local band using SM57s exclusively for all the instruments (6ea).

_________________________
Mark






Mark Foley
Veteran


Jun 14, 2009, 6:41 AM

Post #10 of 59 (2478 views)
Shortcut
Re: [fr0gm@n] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


Quote
If you drive a garbage truck over it then won't the audio you capture sound like .... well....garbage Assuming you were recording while driving over it.

One man's garbage is another man's music....Sly
_________________________
Mark






(This post was edited by Mark Foley on Jun 14, 2009, 6:42 AM)


Chris Nick
User


Jun 14, 2009, 9:45 AM

Post #11 of 59 (2470 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Mark Foley] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post

According to the manual you can definitely record with the two onboard Mics and two xlr input mics. The only thing you can't do is use the external mic plug on the back of the unit at the same time as the internal mics.

I bought 2 sm57s yesterday and a couple of boom mic stands. I guess I'll have to see the exact setup before I decide on placement, but I'll go as close as I can and not try to record farther back in the room. Do you think the SM57 would be a better choice for vocals than the Senn G2 (assuming no interference)?

On Friday we had a hail and thunderstorm go through. As a test, I decided to sit out on the porch with the H4N and record it. The recording makes you really feel like you are there.


Mark Foley
Veteran


Jun 14, 2009, 10:01 AM

Post #12 of 59 (2466 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Chris Nick] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post

The recording makes you really feel like you are there.

As cheap and cheesy the Zooms look (although the H4n look better built), they have great internal mics. With all my high end gear at my disposal, I still like to drop a H2 in front of a violinist or harpist at the ceremony. Don't get much simpler than that...
_________________________
Mark






Brackish
Veteran


Jun 14, 2009, 11:22 AM

Post #13 of 59 (2458 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Chris Nick] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
I think the M3s may be my second pair of mics once I know more of what I'm doing.

Before buying, I would suggest you have a listen to the M3s in a situation similar to your planned use. When I first heard they would be coming out I was excited to learn more. Then I saw their frequency response curve and was a bit put off based on what I saw. Then, more recently, I got a chance to hear them and it confirmed what I saw in the published curve, that being that they can be a bit thin sounding (i.e. no fullness/richness to them) depending on how you use them. If you would be using them for right up on the sound source - say within a yard or so - they may be okay. But for distance mic'ing they don't have much in the low end. I'm thinking they were designed more for up-close instrument mic'ing, either on the instrument itself or "speaker mic'ing" where you have it right up close on the grill.



------------------------------------------------------------
"still motion is who everyone else is trying to be like"


MLiebergot
Veteran


Jun 14, 2009, 11:27 AM

Post #14 of 59 (2456 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Brackish] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


Quote
What do you think of that LSD2, Michael. I was looking at that one a while back.


Well it is a pretty cool mic, that has good fidelity to it.
It is large in size, but I really like the rotatable mic capsules.

What I am not a fan of is the XLR connection at teh base. It is a little touchy, which seems to be a constant thing with the Studio Protects mics.

But overall it's a nice solid performer.

Michael

Cameras: (3) Sony FX1, Canon HV20
Audio: Marantz PMD620, Edirol R44, ZoomH4N, ZoomH2, Sennhesier G2
Mics: Rode NT5, Rode NT3, Rode M3, Rode NTG2, Shure SM57, AT822
Software: Sony Vegas, Final Cut Studio
Computer: MAC BABY! MacPro, MacBook Pro


MLiebergot
Veteran


Jun 14, 2009, 11:36 AM

Post #15 of 59 (2450 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Brackish] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


Quote
Before buying, I would suggest you have a listen to the M3s in a situation similar to your planned use. When I first heard they would be coming out I was excited to learn more. Then I saw their frequency response curve and was a bit put off based on what I saw. Then, more recently, I got a chance to hear them and it confirmed what I saw in the published curve, that being that they can be a bit thin sounding (i.e. no fullness/richness to them) depending on how you use them. If you would be using them for right up on the sound source - say within a yard or so - they may be okay. But for distance mic'ing they don't have much in the low end. I'm thinking they were designed more for up-close instrument mic'ing, either on the instrument itself or "speaker mic'ing" where you have it right up close on the grill.


Well I mic my sources close, so the M3 works great for me.
As I have mentioned before, get the tools that are right for your situation.

For micing studio musicians, I prefer my Rode NT5's, for micing loud instruments, I prefer my Rode M3's. Since I like to mic the PA stacks a a reception, I prefer my Rode M3's. I used them last night to send a wireless feed to a Z5 that I was using. Worked like a champ. BTW, I use the H4n with it's built in mics only to mic the PA stack, and it worked great. And this was a very loud live band.

Now if I had my way, as I was working for someone on this job as a second camera, I would have preferred using the H2 with 2 mics in the XLRs and then send a wireless mix to my camera. I don't liek board feeds, and prefer live sound always. It's just a me thing. I will say that the H4n on it's own with it's build in mics at 90 degrees performed pretty darn well. A little thin, but this can be fixed in post.

But I didn't have the time to do this as even though I was the second camera, I was the main camera for the reception, as the vidoegrapher had 26 or so interviews to do with the bridal party and such during the reception. So I was the only camera for much of the cocktail hour and reception.

But the Rode M3 and Zoom H4n worked great together last night for me.

When I go through the audio, I'll try to put up a sample.

Michael

Cameras: (3) Sony FX1, Canon HV20
Audio: Marantz PMD620, Edirol R44, ZoomH4N, ZoomH2, Sennhesier G2
Mics: Rode NT5, Rode NT3, Rode M3, Rode NTG2, Shure SM57, AT822
Software: Sony Vegas, Final Cut Studio
Computer: MAC BABY! MacPro, MacBook Pro


Brackish
Veteran


Jun 14, 2009, 12:03 PM

Post #16 of 59 (2447 views)
Shortcut
Re: [MLiebergot] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
I don't like board feeds, and prefer live sound always.

Here, here!



------------------------------------------------------------
"still motion is who everyone else is trying to be like"


Brackish
Veteran


Jun 15, 2009, 2:54 AM

Post #17 of 59 (2427 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Chris Nick] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
Is there something in the $100 range that would produce as good sound quality as the unit can record?

Thanks for your help Brackish


I can't really think of anything in the $100 range as far as a
condenser mic (i.e. one that needs a battery or electricity
to operate) that would be worth buying. The problem is that
the mics in that range generally don't sound all that great.
Mostly with mics, you do get what you pay for.

I guess the SM57 non-condenser would be as good as any.

For a little higher price, I know the NT5s that Master Michael
mentioned are decent. I've used them and would say they're
worth what they cost. Personally, I would be disinclined to go
with M3 unless it was just for speaker mic'ing or mic'ing something
where you are placing the mic within a foot of it. Other than
in those situations, their basic nature is to sound rather thin.

I've heard that the Oktava mics from SoundRoom can be nice
for the money. I've heard recordings made with them and they
seemed to be worth what they are charging for them. Not top
of the line but decent, like the NT5s.

On a side note ... I know that the NT5s (and I've heard it's true of
the Oktavas) don't do well outdoors because they don't
get along with wind. They're rather sensitive to wind interference.
You'd have to invest in some pricey wind protection to
keep them in check. This may even go for booming one of these mic's
indoors, where the boom operator would be swinging the mic around.



------------------------------------------------------------
"still motion is who everyone else is trying to be like"


MLiebergot
Veteran


Jun 15, 2009, 6:38 AM

Post #18 of 59 (2412 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Brackish] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


Quote
Mostly with mics, you do get what you pay for.

Well said.

The great thing about mics is that, unlike video equiptment, they hold their price.
You can still find great tube mics on Ebay for a good penny. This is because,
unlike video, the basic concept of audio recording hasn't changed in general over the years.
While the recording devices have gotten smaller, and additional recording formats have come along, compressed mp3 and such. The basic principles on how audio is captured have stayed true. Use the right pickup pattern for your recording situation, cardioid, omni, hyper-cardiod etc. and you are good.

This is why many good audio techs will ahve several different types of mics at their disposal, as not every mic is best suited for every situation.
Just as Brack mentioned, the NT5's are good for studio environment, but they are very sensative so they don't perform the best outside. While the Rode NT3 or Rode M3, when miced closely to the subject, do perform well outside and in loud environments. Outside, I would probably opt for a shotgun mic anyway, Rode NTG2, AT897, or Sennheiser ME66, overmics such as the NT5, M3 mics etc.

A good audio engineer in my area has 2 sets of mics in his arsenal and that's it. Two matched pairs ofm Scheops CMC6's with super hyper and omni caps, and a AT835ST stereo shotgun mic. Of course the Scheops mics are industry standards and $3500, and the shotgun mic is $700, which is beyond the price range of many here, present company included. But he is an audio tech first and video guy second. So this is where his money is invested. But this shows tat you don't need a whole assortment of mics at your disposal, but a few good to gerat mics for use in different situations.

BTW, the Octava mics are good, sorry about not mentioning them earlier.

But like was mentioned earlier, you are going to be hard pressed to find a decent mic in the $100 range. Like everything else, you do get what you pay for.
My recommendation is to think about what your needs are for recording audio and purchase some mics that best fit these needs.
If you find that you will be using these mics in more of a studio environment and indoors then the NT5's, Octava, Studio Projects C4 etc. are good choices.
If you are recording very loud evnironments then the M3 or even the Sennheiser E604 or E614 are good choices, as they can handle the loud SPL levels.
For outdoor recording, stick to shotgun mics for distance recordings of no more than 10 feet, or a stereo mic such as the AT822, is good for close in micing.

Keep in mind that these are only recommendations and not top of the line mics, but more middle of the road mics.

Practice with your mics and figure out which micing configuration you prefer, and when all is said and done
your overall results will put you above many other videographers in your area.
For the price, the H4n does have some remarkable internal mics in it.
Take this and add additional good quality mics for 4-channel recording and the overall experience is stunning.


Michael

Cameras: (3) Sony FX1, Canon HV20
Audio: Marantz PMD620, Edirol R44, ZoomH4N, ZoomH2, Sennhesier G2
Mics: Rode NT5, Rode NT3, Rode M3, Rode NTG2, Shure SM57, AT822
Software: Sony Vegas, Final Cut Studio
Computer: MAC BABY! MacPro, MacBook Pro


Brackish
Veteran


Jun 16, 2009, 11:26 PM

Post #19 of 59 (2366 views)
Shortcut
Re: [MLiebergot] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To

Quote
Mostly with mics, you do get what you pay for.

Well said.


There's not an exact correlation between price and quality but,
generally speaking, there is a good correlation.

There are mic's I've purchased that, once I had them, I didn't think
they were worth what I paid for my usage so I ended up getting rid of
them. One such mic was a large-diaphragm Rode. Not a real expensive
mic but there were things I didn't care about in its character so it
left me. Another one was a Neumann that, while on the lower
end of what Neumann's go for, it still didn't seem worth the price
for my uses so it, too, went away. There were others that didn't
last long ... a Beyerdynamic, an ElectroVoice, an Azden, a Sanken,
an AudioTechnica and probably others that I can't think of right now.

There's one brand that maybe bears mentioning here because,
after having purchased (and still having in my posession) atleast
four of their models, the mic's out of this company have so far
always seemed to be atleast okay or better, with very good build
quality and good features in a fairly-priced product: AudioTechnica.
If someone was to say to me "I want to get some mic's but
really don't know much about audio - but I don't want to get stuck
with garbage or make a horrible choice" I would say "going
with AudioTechnica is a pretty safe bet that you're getting
what you pay for in a well-made product".
So ... if you spend $100 on an AudioTechnica, you won't
be getting a $500 mic but you will be getting at least a $100 mic
with good build quality that will work and not fall apart.
I've got one AT I bought for like $200 or so. Does it sound "great"?
No. But it sounds alright for $200 dollars as compared to other
$200 mic's around, with a real solid build quality, and nice features
for the money like being very quiet (i.e. no hiss), bass rolloff switch,
built-in pad/attenuator switch.

One thing I've done is mostly avoid the Chinese mic's so I really don't
have any experience with them. Was thinking about a Nady once
(which I think is Chinese) but ... More I like to stick with Japanese
or European makes.
I did hear about one guy putting mic's together which I think
were American (Peluso mic) and which I considered for purchase
but then I heard about some quality control issue - I'm sure taken
care of by now.



------------------------------------------------------------
"still motion is who everyone else is trying to be like"

(This post was edited by Brackish on Jun 17, 2009, 12:17 AM)


Brackish
Veteran


Jun 17, 2009, 3:19 AM

Post #20 of 59 (2356 views)
Shortcut
Re: [MLiebergot] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
You can still find great tube mics on Ebay for a good penny.


You know who's got a really nice tube mic out right now?
I was quite surprised but it's M-Audio! Model is called the Sputnik:

Thing goes for about $700. Sounds pretty dang good. And it's from

M-Audio?!?





------------------------------------------------------------
"still motion is who everyone else is trying to be like"


MLiebergot
Veteran


Jun 17, 2009, 6:22 AM

Post #21 of 59 (2348 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Brackish] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post

I have hear very good things about the M-Audio's as well.
I am a fan of a lot of M-Audio's products, good solid construction. As a matter of fact I use the DX series monitors for my studio work.

I am also a fan of the Blue mics, such as Baby Bottle and DragonFly mics. Again on the more expensive side, but nice frequency response on them.

And I agree with Audio Technica mics. I was using them early on and settled for my Rode mics. But that's a personal preference.
The AT mics always were reliable and produced good accurate sound reproduction.

Michael

Cameras: (3) Sony FX1, Canon HV20
Audio: Marantz PMD620, Edirol R44, ZoomH4N, ZoomH2, Sennhesier G2
Mics: Rode NT5, Rode NT3, Rode M3, Rode NTG2, Shure SM57, AT822
Software: Sony Vegas, Final Cut Studio
Computer: MAC BABY! MacPro, MacBook Pro


Brackish
Veteran


Jun 18, 2009, 1:46 AM

Post #22 of 59 (2327 views)
Shortcut
Re: [MLiebergot] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
I am also a fan of the Blue mics, such as Baby Bottle and DragonFly mics.

Well, they certainly do look nice.



------------------------------------------------------------
"still motion is who everyone else is trying to be like"


Brackish
Veteran


Jun 18, 2009, 1:58 AM

Post #23 of 59 (2325 views)
Shortcut
Re: [MLiebergot] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
the NT5's are good for studio environment, but they are very sensative so they don't perform the best outside


Yeah, they're "studio mics" but they can perform fine most anywhere
indoors, not just in the studio environment. Just don't want the newbies
to think they are only for studio. As long as you're not outside they
work fine. I actually have used them outside but they need good fur
covering. (The problem outside is high sensitivity to wind disturbance.)

On a side note ... they are a bit sensitive to humidity and a few times
I have had them spit a bit when the humidity got high. Mic's vary
in their sensitivity to humidity. What they do when the
humidity gets to them is they start "spitting". The reason
it's called spitting is because it actually sounds like a person
intermittently spitting ... think the sound of ppp ... ppp ... ppp.



------------------------------------------------------------
"still motion is who everyone else is trying to be like"


Brackish
Veteran


Jun 18, 2009, 2:13 AM

Post #24 of 59 (2324 views)
Shortcut
Re: [MLiebergot] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
Outside, I would probably opt for a shotgun mic anyway, Rode NTG2, AT897, or Sennheiser ME66, overmics such as the NT5, M3 mics etc.


Oh, yeah, definitely. Outside is where a good shotgun really
comes into its own. I've got a pretty nice shotgun and when I
first started in the business - you know "back in the day" everyone
was advised they had to get a shotgun - I used it mostly
indoors and was basically disappointed time after time but
I kept using it because it was what everyone did. (Remember
all the talk of the ME66 ... you hardly ever hear the 66 mentioned
any more.) Then, one time I had some outdoor video coverage
that needed to be done. (Outdoor shooting was very rare for
me as almost every single gig was indoors in a church.)
After that outdoor gig shot with a shotgun, when I listened back later,
I was like "WOW". As bad as it sounded indoors was as good as it
sounded outdoors. I actually had been coming close to selling that
pricey shotgun cuz every indoor recording with it bordered
on lousy but now I keep it on hand for the occasional outdoor
work,where it shines. Sometimes I think to myself "that's a lot
of money for a mic that doesn't get that much use" but it's just
sooooo good when it does get implemented.



------------------------------------------------------------
"still motion is who everyone else is trying to be like"


Mark Foley
Veteran


Jun 18, 2009, 3:56 AM

Post #25 of 59 (2316 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Brackish] Mic to complement h4n [In reply to] Can't Post

I too was amazed when I first got on VU and just a newbie in the wedding biz of all the talk of shotguns. I couldn't believe people were recommending them for indoor ceremonies...but being a "new" guy, I didn't say much. Unless properly located from the sound source, they are about the worst choice one could make as all of the off axis sound will eventually bounce around long enough to be captured by th mic capsule...but so out of phase that "weak" barely describes the sound, IMO. However, they do very well outdoors because there is almost no reflective sound migrating into the capsule.
_________________________
Mark






(This post was edited by Mark Foley on Jun 18, 2009, 3:57 AM)

First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All